The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It truly is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or Female don't approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they are able to do if they could Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners might look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. During the meantime police shall remain neutral during the private dispute between the parties, however, if any with the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall get prompt action against them under legislation. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court inside the United States. Reduce courts over the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its own judicial system that involves trial and appellate courts. The highest court in each state is commonly referred to because the “supreme” court, Whilst there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Even though state courts may additionally generally listen to cases involving federal check here laws.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's convenient for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to eliminate a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got achieved this sort of stage. Read more

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the merit of the many qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of suitable candidates that are found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored through the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part in the respondent department.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.

Problems or Errors If you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a terrible link or even a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Centre.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is very well set up now that the provision for proforma promotion is not really alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service structure however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service towards the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay back and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

States also normally have courts that cope with only a specific subset of legal matters, which include family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending over the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case regulation may be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in Big apple is not really binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning might help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more